Blog

The Elections are Coming, The Elections are Coming. Oh My.

2018 Senate Seats up for Election

Blue = Currently held by a Democrat

Red = Currently held by a Republican

Yellow = Currently held by an Independent

Who's excited about next year's elections?

Yeah, me neither. The big question is, will the Republicans continue to hold both Houses of Congress? With the Republicans less than stellar (to put it mildly) achievements so far, who knows? It's really hard to generate much excitement from the base with all the broken promises. However, from my perspective, I'm not really seeing all that much-sustained excitement coming from the Democratic base either, especially when their entire platform is based on attacking Donald Trump.

Theoretically, the Senate should be fairly easy for the Republicans to hold or gain seats. Of the 33 seats up for election, Republicans only have to defend eight seats. The remaining 25 are currently held by 23 Democrats and 2 Independents who caucus with the Democrats. Notable among those 23 Democratic seats are that ten are in states that were won by Donald Trump, some by double digits, in last year's Presidential elections.

One of those seats is currently held by Joe Donnelly in my home state of Indiana which Donald Trump took by 19%. While it's calmed down now, as early as March we started being inundated with ads for next year’s Senate race. While no serious candidate has declared their intention to run, my problem is that the two that most mentioned as competing for the Republican nomination, Luke Messer and Todd Rokita are current House members who have poor Conservative voting records. I should also point out that next to West Virginia's Joe Manchin, Joe Donnelly is one of the Democrats most conservative members, especially when it comes to voting for life.

Another state in similar circumstances is Missouri, currently held by Democrat Claire McCaskill, a state that Donald Trump won by 18%. Senator McCaskill received some attention earlier this year for calling out now AG Jeff Sessions for his meetings, as a Senator, with the Russian ambassador only to be quickly rebuked when it was revealed that she too had similar meetings in the past with the Russian ambassador.

Along those lines, it was with some interest when I came across the recent headline: "Top Missouri Republican Breaks Hearts, Won’t Challenge McCaskill" in Townhall.com stating that Ann Wagner will forego a chance to run for the U.S. Senate and instead concentrate on running for re-election for her seat in the Missouri state House of Representatives. The line in the article: "Wagner had the support of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the National Republican Senatorial Committee," made me thankful that she chose not to run as I don't feel we need another reliable GOP establishment follower in DC.

It was shortly after Rep. Wagner's announcement that she would not seek the Senate seat that I was encouraged for Missouri when I heard Austin Petersen on the interview circuit making his case for a Senate run on the Republican ticket.

Most will likely recall Austin Petersen's run for the Presidency in 2016 for nomination on the Libertarian ticket. I, along with many others, felt that the Libertarian party blew a big chance for having a louder voice on the national stage, considering that both major party candidates were extremely unpopular, by nominating Gary Johnson to represent the party on the ballot, especially since his biggest campaign issues were legalizing marijuana plus comparing himself to Democrat/Socialist Bernie Sanders.

On July 4th Austin Petersen made his candidacy official with the op/ed "Why I’m running as a Republican for U.S. Senate," in the Kansas City Star stating:

As I’ve said elsewhere, my vision for America is one where gay married couples can defend their marijuana fields with fully automatic machine guns. Technological and social changes notwithstanding, this is ultimately the kind of world that the Founding Fathers envisioned — where all lives matter from conception to death, and where all people are given the opportunity to make the most of their inherent liberties as rational human beings.

If I am elected, I will strive to put Washington in its rightful place — as the protector of our most basic liberties, not our political policeman — and put the people in their rightful place — as the true governors and shapers of their lives and destiny.

For a completely different opinion on Austin Petersen’s candidacy, I would encourage you to listen to one of our newest Lanterneer and Missouri native Blake Johnson’s podcast:"Should a Christian Vote for an Atheist."

 

 

Establishment versus Non-Establishment, Always-Trumpers versus Meh-Trumpers and Never-Trumpers, Republicans versus Democrats, next year promises to be interesting and likely infuriating and frustrating. In other words, quoting Herman's Hermits, "second verse same as the first."


Written by Mark Watkins

Conservatarian blogger living in the Upper Midwest. Strong believer in personal responsibility, smaller federal government and the Constitution in it's original meaning. Articles and thoughts can also be found at markEwatkins.com


2 Responses

Bravo Mark! I'm with you on Peterson for sure.

Thank you Julie


Madisons

We're here to fix the machine

Lanterns

We're here to fix the machine.

We are here to fix the machine. The machine is the federal government that has been fundamentally transformed the serve the elite instead of "We The People". Our goal is to engage our fellow Americans on the battlefield of ideas to discover the most ideal way for our nation to be governed to provide the most security with the maximum amount of liberty and freedom for all American citizens. We welcome all people from all walks of life and ideologies to engage with us. Join us on the battlefield of ideas.

Follow us