Perusing some my favorite websites I came across an article I very much identified with written by Erick Erickson for the site that he founded, The Resurgent, titled "A Stranger in a Strange Land: "I Feel Out of Place and Out of Sorts in American Politics Today." In the article, Erick describes going from a Republican officeholder (as an Atlanta city councilman) to someone who doesn't identify with either party now.
While I hope that those that see this will read Erick's entire article here are some excerpts that I particularly related to:
Nowadays it seems both parties have positions on everything and they set their position not by what is best but by what the other side is for. They are guaranteed to be the opposite. And both sides are so tribal and now into cults of personality that the ideas are no longer important. Beating the other side is important. And American history shows over and over and over that it is impossible to beat the other side. There is no permanence in American politics.
I want a new party, and a conservative one where conservatism is not defined by beating the other side, but by pursuing the best policies.
I want a party that recognizes we need a social safety net because there are those who, through physical or mental infirmity, cannot take care of themselves. But I want a party discerning enough to not let everybody onto the safety net.
I want a party that is pro-family and structures the tax code accordingly and fights for school choice so parents can get their kids educated instead of indoctrinated.
I want a party that is pro-life and that does not run from the Bible.
I want a pro-life, pro-family party that does not want to round up a twenty year old and send him back to a country he does not know after his parents brought him here as a toddler and this is the only country he has every known. But I also want a party that does not give his parents citizenship, even if we decide to let them stay here.
I want a party that secures its border, but does not demonize its neighbors.
I want a party that supports the second amendment, but also supports the first amendment.
I want a party that recognizes as long as Washington makes all our decisions then every hill is a hill to die on and every fight is bloody so that it de-escalates the fights by making Washington less central to our lives.
I want a party that does not define people by the color of their skin or where their families came from, but sees us all as part of the American experiment.
And I want a party that is beholden to ideas, not men.
He closes with this:
I’m kind of homesick for a country
To which I’ve never been before
No sad goodbyes will there be spoken
For time won’t matter anymore
Beulah Land, I’m longing for you
And some day on thee I’ll stand
There my home shall be eternal
Beulah Land – Sweet Beulah Land
Reflecting on this, I was thinking about the presidential primary elections of 2016 and how I learned that so many people and groups who claimed to be about the traditional conservative movement were more interested in self-promotion and winning at all costs. This includes so many of the evangelicals who sold out for Donald Trump, from many of the personalities at Fox News, from websites like Breitbart and the Gateway Pundit, and also many of the prominent Tea Party spokespeople like Scottie Nell Hughes, Katrina Pierson, and Sarah Palin to name a few who turned out to be more interested in gaining publicity than living up to the ideals of smaller government and Constitutional rule that they had previously stated they believed in.
For the record, in the above statements, I am talking about those who joined the "Trump Train" early when there were so many other, better-qualified choices who were still in the running.